Elon Musk's Bold Move to Combat Bots

Dan Nicholson

Musk is considering putting the entirety of X, formerly known as Twitter, behind a paywall with the aim of combating the bot menace that has plagued the platform for years. 

Bots: The Silent Destructors

For those unfamiliar with the term, “bots” on social media platforms like Twitter are automated accounts designed to perform specific tasks. While some bots are innocent and even helpful, others spread spam, disinformation, or amplify messages to distort public opinion. Musk's idea is simple: by charging even a nominal fee for accessing the platform, the cost of maintaining vast bot networks becomes prohibitive.

While this reasoning might seem sound in theory, the real-world implications of such a move are multifaceted and not entirely positive.

The Economics of Paywalls

At first glance, the introduction of a monthly payment might seem to be a move motivated by profits. After all, Musk has expressed concerns about turning his acquisition into a profitable venture. However, the core idea revolves around the bot problem. By introducing a financial barrier, even a "small amount," it raises the stakes for those operating bots, as each bot would require a distinct payment method.

Musk's idea of using financial deterrents to dissuade harmful behaviors is not novel. In fact, it aligns with broader economic theories that suggest people (or entities) change behavior when faced with economic incentives or disincentives.

The Challenge of User Retention and Advertising Revenue

X, in its essence, thrived because of its vast, active user base. The introduction of a monthly fee, no matter how minimal, threatens this user base. As dissatisfaction with the platform grows, the decision to pay even a small fee becomes a significant one, pushing users to explore alternative platforms.

Furthermore, X has a symbiotic relationship with advertisers, who reach out to its millions of users daily. Alienating a vast majority of these users would undoubtedly deter advertisers, further dwindling the platform's revenue streams. With an estimated 830,000 accounts subscribed to X Premium out of a whopping 540 million monthly users, one must ponder whether a monthly payment system for all would be lucrative.

Comparison with Previous Monetization Attempts

Musk's past endeavors to monetize the platform, like the repricing of the Twitter Blue subscription service to X Premium, haven't been resoundingly successful. Turning the coveted blue tick verification badge into a paid subscription perk was met with criticism. Many argued that it effectively rendered the symbol meaningless.

The Larger Picture: AI, Regulation, and Hate Speech

Beyond the bot problem and potential paywalls, the conversation between Musk and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu highlighted other pressing issues. These include the broader challenges of regulating AI technology and addressing hate speech on the platform. 


While Musk's proposed solution to the bot problem is intriguing, its execution and implications remain to be seen. It's a bold move and could change the landscape of social media monetization. However, its success hinges on its execution, user reception, and the platform's ability to retain its advertisers and active user base. 



Tech Crunch


Dan Nicholson is the author of “Rigging the Game: How to Achieve Financial Certainty, Navigate Risk and Make Money on Your Own Terms,” deemed a best-seller by USA Today and The Wall Street Journal. In addition to founding the award-winning accounting and financial consulting firm Nth Degree CPAs, Dan has created and run multiple small businesses, including Certainty U and the Certified Certainty Advisor program.

No items found.
No items found.
Next Up In
No items found.
Banner for Certainty Tools, Play your Game.  Blue gradient color with CertaintyU Logo
No items found.
No items found.